Biotech Basket Update: +51.88% Return on Invested Capital
The Power of Position Sizing
Back in October, I built a small “biotech basket” consisting of four names: TWST, REGN, NTLA, and CATX. I decided to weight my higher-conviction ideas at 3% each while keeping the more speculative names at a smaller 1% weight.
I know that investing in biotech always comes with volatility, and this cohort proved it. NTLA was hit after some bad news and the stock plummeted -50%. I took the loss in a non-taxable account so I could not even use it as a write-off. However, because it was sized correctly, this was barely a scratch on the total portfolio.
We lost some readers along the way especially those who don’t respect position sizing but the results speak for themselves: by sticking to the math of position sizing, this basket delivered a 50%+ return even as the QQQ dropped ~7%. It proves that generating alpha isn’t just about selecting the right tickers but also having the discipline to size appropriately.
The Individual Impact:
TWST (3% position, +110%): Contributed +3.30% to the total portfolio.
REGN (3% position, +45%): Contributed +1.35% to the total portfolio.
NTLA (1% position, -50%): Contributed -0.50% to the total portfolio.
CATX (1% position, flat): Contributed 0.00% to the total portfolio.
For disclosure:
I have already covered my entire cost basis in TWST, so those are now 'house shares.' I am currently on my second round in REGN after booking a 50% gain on the first. I have exited NTLA for a 50% loss and closed CATX for a nominal 2–3% gain, essentially flat.
The Bottom Line:
Even with one position losing half its value, this 8% total allocation delivered a 4.15% gain to the overall portfolio. That represents a ~52% return on the capital actually deployed. The power of Position Sizing.
Thank you for reading and see you for the next one!



You only need one big winner to cover the weaker performing stocks in a basket.
And your strategy showed just that.
On your trimming and “house shares” mindset, once you reach recouping the entire cost basis of the position, do you look at it differently as a long term hold or apply the same trimming mindset in future?